Kanban vs Scrum testing

Cadence

  • Scrum: Fixed sprints (1–4 weeks). Testing must finish inside the sprint.
  • Kanban: Continuous flow. Testing starts as soon as work is ready.

When testing starts

  • Scrum: During sprint planning; testing tasks go on the sprint board.
  • Kanban: Immediately when a story moves to “In Development” or “Ready for Test”.

Deadline pressure

  • Scrum: Hard sprint deadline – risk of carry-over if testing lags.
  • Kanban: No sprint end – smoother pace but testing can become a bottleneck.

Definition of Done (DoD)

  • Scrum: Mandatory and strictly enforced every sprint.
  • Kanban: Also mandatory, enforced via explicit column exit policies and WIP limits.

Typical board columns

  • Scrum: To Do → In Progress → Code Review → Testing → Done.
  • Kanban: To Do → Dev → Ready for Test → Testing → Done (or similar).

Testing bottlenecks

  • Scrum: Become visible at sprint end (burndown chart).
  • Kanban: Visible instantly when the Testing column piles up.

Automation discipline

  • Scrum: High – must match sprint velocity.
  • Kanban: Even higher pressure – queue explodes if you don’t automate.

Exploratory & manual testing

  • Scrum: Planned sessions inside the sprint.
  • Kanban: Done ad-hoc or scheduled whenever needed.

Best for

  • Scrum: Predictable cadence, strong quality gates, new feature teams.
  • Kanban: Fast-moving features, production bugs, support-heavy teams, ML/experiments.

Risk of testing debt

  • Scrum: Lower (sprint forces closure).
  • Kanban: Higher if WIP limits on testing are missing or ignored.

2025 trends

  • Scrum: Paired with AI tools (mabl, testRigor) for auto-healing inside sprints.
  • Kanban: Often uses AI triage and “testing as a service” queues (Rainforest, testRigor monitoring).

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *